This fat boy is up to no good.



EDIT: Image removed by moderator.

Moderator: Image is still there.

Jordan: Image is gone

It is now. It wasn't when I posted. Simply a heads up to the moderator to recheck.

Quote:

QUOTE:
This fat boy is up to no good.



EDIT: Image removed by moderator.

What the hell was so bad about that image? No frontal nudity. I thought this might be a good reminder that we must be ever watchful when our children are surfing.

This forum is so stuffy one can't have any fun at all. After all this is the year 2007 not 1930.

I am the one that removed the image. I am not one to poke around much, but today I just happened to catch this. No doubt there has been worse. . . I just think this was wrong. It's making light of a situation that hits close to home. I know many students of mine that have been sucked in by perverts online, and the picture was just wrong and against our acceptable use policy.

Maybe you should re-name this forum to the "Baby Doll" forum and no joking allowed.

Just a suggestion. :)

You really don't think a pervert sitting naked at his computer preying on children is not at all obcene? :rolleyes:

I never saw it. I was only chiming in on the restricted state that this forum has become. Every picture, every joke, somebody is going to take offense to. :bs:

Now that the picture has been described to you, what is your answer?

You have the pic?..PM it to me please.

Thanks

That's about what I expected from you.

Quote:

You really don't think a pervert sitting naked at his computer preying on children is not at all obcene?

Well to be precise about it, it was just a picture of a fat old guy sitting naked in front of the computer. Everyone just assumes that he is a pervert and what he may or may not be doing.

Personally I think this guy just likes to sit around in his underwear (or naked, you can't really tell with all the fat) and someone in the house snapped the picture, put and put it on the internet as a joke using the guise that he's a child predator.

But to answer your question yeah pictures of naked fat old men are obscene! }(

Quote:

Maybe you should re-name this forum to the "Baby Doll" forum and no joking allowed.

Just a suggestion.

You sad man... You just don't get it. You don't submit jokes. You have not once submitted a joke. You submit obscenity. A few laugh -- but most cringe.

And just how in the hell would you know what my reaction to a posted joke or obscenity would be ,or anyone else. I see nothing but a bunch of hypocritical complainers that want to set the moral standards of others that they have no conception of . I say again,far worse than the fat boy image has been posted here,in text if not image , And to ,I'm surprised that it is so offensive to this predominantly left wing liberal forum.

Quote:

QUOTE:
...this predominantly left wing liberal forum.

You are kidding, aren't you?

---

Paul D

Oh don't deny it. If you want to, let's start a poll!

http://madrabbit.net/webrabbit/quizshow.html

Jim.

Cool link. I'll start a new thread. Thanks

Quote:

And just how in the hell would you know what my reaction to a posted joke or obscenity would be

You have left an electronic paper trail here of your feelings addressing a wide variety of subject matter. And, although you have incited none of those subjects but only answered to them, should not conclusions be drawn about your present reactions from your own prior representations?

And I mentioned no other person by name in my comments directed specifically at someone I consider a damned fool. That you think my thoughts also alluded to you speaks volumes.

Your reaction to almost anything is eminently predictable -- you will straddle the fence and apologize in case you have offended anyone on either side of it. Except when you join up with your blood-thirsty little cretin pack to link your doorknob IQs in an attempt to harry an individual -- then you blossom into full and proud voice.

You once described me as a Canadian alcoholic who's opinion you had no time for. Why then do you continue to honor me with your attention?

As far as I'm concerned you are well represented by your ominous avatar -- a sour old man in endless search of new rationalization.

I usually pride myself in having respect for my elders, but in your case I'll sadly make an exception.

And you would be wise in future to follow the lawyer's admonition: Never ask a question you don't know the answer to. Because I have plenty more of this in reserve and I am not restrained in my opinion of you by reason of being a moderator.

DO YOU REALLY THINK I GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOUR OPINION OF ME . YOU ARE IN MY OPINION A DAMN FOOL THAT HAS NO CREDENTIALS. YOU GET YOUR JOLLIES DEMONIZING OTHERS THAT YOU MISTAKENLY FEEL ARE INFERIOR TO YOU. WHY ,I HAVEN'T A CLUE.JUST WHAT IN THE HELL DO YOU DO JAMES ? SIT AT THE COMPUTER WITH A DICTIONAIRY IN YOUR LAP. IN MY 25 YEAR MILITARY CAREER I MET A FEW OF YOUR CALIBER,THEY DIDN'T IMPRESS ME EITHER . I BELONG TO NO FORIEGN FORUMS,WHY DO YOU FEEL THAT YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO DENIGRATE MY GOVERNMENT?THAT IS APPARENTLY WHY YOU VISIT HERE,DO YOU PAY ANY TAXES TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ? YOU HAVE NO DOG IN THE FIGHT,WHY THEN DO YOU INSIST ON A VOICE, OR PERHAPS YOU AS I SAID OUNCE BEFORE ARE A GODDAMMED COWARDLY DRAFT DODGER,CALLING HIMSELF A CANADIAN.IF YOU ARE REPESENITIVE OF THE CANADIAN POPULACE,THEN I AM GLAD I WILL NEVER HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOUR COUNTRY.IF IT IS YOUR COUNTRY ! I ALSO SUSPECT THAT YOU ARE SOMETHING ELSE ,I WONT SAY HERE.IF YOU CONTINUE TO ADDRESS ME AS AN IMBICILE ,THEN I SHALL RESPOND IN KIND.
:bs: :rolleyes: :bs: :rolleyes:

Lay it on him Bobw,lay it on that Canadian

As Canadians I think we are entitled to our opinions of your government as it affects us whether you think it does or not.Since when do I have to pay to have an opinion?I am not saying I agree with James or not but I do think he has every right to express his whether you agree or not.The US has become the world power and all that comes with it and that includes criticism.

I neither care for your Country or Government ,what is done there does not affect me,nor am I dependent on your Country for anything.The only thing I can think of is oil,and hell I don't know what part of the world the fuel I use in my vehicles comes from.If I find out it is Canadian, I will switch to Venezuelan (Citgo)I have more respect for them,in spite of the ruling dictator.

You've become unhinged, Bob.

Not that we would notice the difference. :-)

I didn't mean to start another war. :clap: :clap: :clap:

you typed that in all CAPS. are you going to apologize?

Quote:

you typed that in all CAPS. are you going to apologize?

NO ! why should I ? apparently you believe in the double standard. James has called me everything but a sewing machine agent,and made many derogatory remarks as to my mental state . NO again,I don't intend to take his :bs: laying down, or anyone else's.

Yeah, but you don't have to shout.

A sewing machine agent. Would that be the same door-to-door slick who sold my mother a Singer back in the early 50's for $1 a week? I had to wear the ugly trousers she made for me to school every day for months. Lost at least three girlfriends. Ouch!

No, that would be hitting pretty low, Bob.

You're at least a level above that. Maybe the distributor of the franchises to sell the sewing machines. As long as there wasn't too much paper work involved.

Boy, with all this bickering, there must be people deserting this site in droves.

Quote:

DO YOU REALLY THINK I GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOUR OPINION OF ME

Wow! Yes you do! I'm surprised.

But, obviously, you have a deep perhaps even a congenital need to be embraced and absolved by foreigners.

As Oscar Wilde said, "Each man kills the thing he loves."

So, for the better good, I'll allow you to kill me, BobW.

For the moment, anyway. Gotta pay attention to the hockey game.

Quote:

QUOTE:
DO YOU REALLY THINK I GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOUR OPINION OF ME . YOU ARE IN MY OPINION A DAMN FOOL THAT HAS NO CREDENTIALS. YOU GET YOUR JOLLIES DEMONIZING OTHERS THAT YOU MISTAKENLY FEEL ARE INFERIOR TO YOU. WHY ,I HAVEN'T A CLUE.JUST WHAT IN THE HELL DO YOU DO JAMES ? SIT AT THE COMPUTER WITH A DICTIONAIRY IN YOUR LAP. IN MY 25 YEAR MILITARY CAREER I MET A FEW OF YOUR CALIBER,THEY DIDN'T IMPRESS ME EITHER . I BELONG TO NO FORIEGN FORUMS,WHY DO YOU FEEL THAT YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO DENIGRATE MY GOVERNMENT?THAT IS APPARENTLY WHY YOU VISIT HERE,DO YOU PAY ANY TAXES TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ? YOU HAVE NO DOG IN THE FIGHT,WHY THEN DO YOU INSIST ON A VOICE, OR PERHAPS YOU AS I SAID OUNCE BEFORE ARE A GODDAMMED COWARDLY DRAFT DODGER,CALLING HIMSELF A CANADIAN.IF YOU ARE REPESENITIVE OF THE CANADIAN POPULACE,THEN I AM GLAD I WILL NEVER HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOUR COUNTRY.IF IT IS YOUR COUNTRY ! I ALSO SUSPECT THAT YOU ARE SOMETHING ELSE ,I WONT SAY HERE.IF YOU CONTINUE TO ADDRESS ME AS AN IMBICILE ,THEN I SHALL RESPOND IN KIND.
:bs: :rolleyes: :bs: :rolleyes:

I agree with the above. I was stationed in North Bay Ontario Canada with 22nd NORAD Region Headquarters from 1976 to 1980 in my 23 years of service defending both Canada and the United States. I most likely have a longer lineage in Canada they most since I can trace my family back 11 generations on the french side to Arcadia then France.

The moderators of this board have every right to delete what they want, it is their board partially supported by our donations.

Political correctness is a form of censorship.

Many on far left believe in free speech as long as that speech meets their standards, other wise they deem it politically incorrect or brand it as hate speech.

I can see the day where we cannot call it a Polish sausage because some one from Poland might find it offensive. We will have to call it a sausage from a eastern European country :lol: :-)

May I ask how you propose to remove it from the Internet overall ? That image has been on the net for ages.Just because it was removed from here,does that mean it no longer exist ?

Did I ever say I proposed to take it off of the internet as a whole? No, not once. I simply said it was not something that should be here based on our acceptable use policy.

Beth, I did not see the picture, but I certainly appreciate your higher standards.

Whatever it was, thank you for removing it.

Then I would suggest that in the future that you remove all post that have a sexual insinuation ,or suggestion,and I have read many that have been posted here ,by those that agree with you . And of course you rightfully exercised your prerogative and judgement in removing the post.

Stuffy? Hardly.

I trust Beth's judgement.

I take it this was not about the Fat Boy nuclear device.

I can't believe all the whiny asses that are complaining here! The owner of this website removed a stupid picture! Who cares! She can remove anything she wants, at anytime she wants, for whatever reason.

And should do so without retribution from a bunch of complainers.

There are better ways to address the online predator situation.

Here's a good one:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_Catch_a_Predator


She's having a baby!!! LAY OFF!

Quote:

I can't believe all the whiny asses that are complaining here!

What's not to believe? It's the usual suspects. What else should we expect?

All the best to you, Beth and Jason.

No message

You're just wrong.

I don't think he was referring to the mods.

That reply was to bycycle. He posted full frontal nudity and Alex deleted the post.

Quote:

QUOTE:
That reply was to bycycle. He posted full frontal nudity and Alex deleted the post.

He posted full frontal nudity and Alex deleted the post

That is a bald faced lie and you know it.

I agree. He is incorrect on several levels: 1. The picture, in part, was a side view of a seemingly naked, morbidly obese man sitting in front of a computer. 2. Alex was not the person who "deleted the post". 3. The post was not deleted. 4. The picture was deleted by Beth. 5. Alex removed the link to the picture that Beth failed to remove.

Jim.

Quote:

QUOTE:
I agree. He is incorrect on several levels: 1. The picture, in part, was a side view of a seemingly naked, morbidly obese man sitting in front of a computer. 2. Alex was not the person who "deleted the post". 3. The post was not deleted. 4. The picture was deleted by Beth. 5. Alex removed the link to the picture that Beth failed to remove.

Jim.

Thanks KJT. I am loving this. Stir up shit and sit back and watch. :lol:

Now you're wrong. Alex deleted post #16, where Bycycle posted an animated picture full of topless babes. As you can see in my post #17 I was referring to the #16 deleted post.

And I guess you're right Bycycle it wasn't full frontal nudity. Just topless, and to me that's all the full frontal nudity I'm most in love with! :7

And I guess you're right Bycycle it wasn't full frontal nudity. Just topless, and to me that's all the full frontal nudity I'm most in love with!

Alllllright!! :clap:

Wrong!!! The post was deleted after Alex edited it with a warning for bike dude. The post Adam is refering to is #16. It's gone.

This thread is now locked. There is sufficient insanity in this world, we need not add to it.